“Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new.” — Albert Einstein

IPO: Tougher

Thursday, January 26, 2006 | No comments

Check other articles in the series...

WSJ article IPO Obstacles Hinder Startups offers a good coverage of how IPOs are becoming tougher for small venture-backed companies.

This raises the question, what should CEOs and early-stage VCs do, once a company has reached $100 M+ in annual sales? (Below this threshhold, it is absolutely undesirable to go public; investor courting, ongoing investor management, Sarbanes-Oaxley compliance related paperwork and massive expenses - being some key distractors …)

In general, by year 5 or year 6 in a company’s history, the Series A investors, the Founders, and the early executive team that is still around - get itchy to extract some liquidity. Today, given the sophistication, the available money, and the level of activity in the Private Equity industry, a late-stage / LBO fund could easily step in and provide the necessary liquidity.

Liquidity, I believe, is no reason to go public prematurely. An enterprise that has built-in scalability should stay private, stay on course, and execute, execute, execute. If, however, the business does NOT have built-in scalability - and most don’t - they should absolutely NEVER go public. They should get acquired, and become part of a larger portfolio.

Last year, 41 start-ups backed by venture-capital investors became publicly traded U.S. companies, down from 67 in 2004 and 250 in the boom year of 1999, according to research firm VentureOne.

I would say, the recent numbers are much closer to what they should be.

After all, how many enterprises really have built-in scalability in their business model?

Most companies simply go public and then struggle, giving smart investors absolutely no reason to touch them, and hence, giving analysts no incentive to cover them!

Rather, a secondary exit market for private placements of a chunk of the company’s shares held by early shareholders - is a far better alternative.

This segment is part 3 in a 9 part series
Jump to part: IPO, Early Validation, Tougher, Some Thoughts, Outlook, Time, Wait?, Sandisk, IPO

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


Free Updates

Subscribe to feed (learn more)

Or get updates by e-mail:

Recent Comments

  • I congratulate the engineers on this projects Sramana. I recently saw a documentary showing the rate of glacial melting that feeds the Ganges and a photographer… David Bristow on Vision India 2020: Gangotri
  • Dear Sramana, I fully agree with you and today we need people like you who are not only Visionary but also have practical solutions. This type of Micro fin… valmik soni on Vision India 2020: Bioscope
  • Thanks Sramana-Reading this piece brought be back to my childhood memories in calcutta during 70s and 80s- growing up in our ancestral home on Harish Mukherjee … Anindya Bose on As India Builds (Part 8)
  • Sramana, I remember seeing such social messages on Doordarshan when I was in primary school ("Mile Sur mera tumhara.." and "Ek-Anek"). So this point is valid… Arpit Agarwal on Vision India 2020: Bioscope
  • Sramana, I was following your site for quite some time.I am trying to learn a thing or 2 from your postings.Your postings are very detailed and insightful. … live mirchi on Welcome Problem, Unwelcome Time
  • Arpit, Landholders are not necessarily the segment we're after, here. We're after the poor. I have a very hard time believing that India has reached a level … Sramana Mitra on Vision India 2020: Bioscope

From Related Sites