Narayan Murthy’s Speech at NYU (Part 4)

Saturday, July 7, 2007 | No comments

Check other articles in the series...

A final story: On a hot summer morning in 1995, a Fortune-10 corporation had sequestered all their Indian software vendors, including Infosys, in different rooms at the Taj Residency hotel in Bangalore so that the vendors could not communicate with one another. This customer’s propensity for tough negotiations was well-known. Our team was very nervous.

First of all, with revenues of only around $5 million, we were minnows compared to the customer.

Second, this customer contributed fully 25% of our revenues. The loss of this business would potentially devastate our recently-listed company.

Third, the customer’s negotiation style was very aggressive. The customer team would go from room to room, get the best terms out of each vendor and then pit one vendor against the other. This went on for several rounds. Our various arguments why a fair price — one that allowed us to invest in good people, R&D, infrastructure, technology and training — was actually in their interest failed to cut any ice with the customer.

By 5 p.m. on the last day, we had to make a decision right on the spot whether to accept the customer’s terms or to walk out.

All eyes were on me as I mulled over the decision. I closed my eyes, and reflected upon our journey until then. Through many a tough call, we had always thought about the long-term interests of Infosys. I communicated clearly to the customer team that we could not accept their terms, since it could well lead us to letting them down later. But I promised a smooth, professional transition to a vendor of customer’s choice.

This was a turning point for Infosys.

Subsequently, we created a Risk Mitigation Council which ensured that we would never again depend too much on any one client, technology, country, application area or key employee. The crisis was a blessing in disguise. Today, Infosys has a sound de-risking strategy that has stabilized its revenues and profits.

(to be continued)






This segment is part 4 in a 6 part series
Jump to part: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


Free Updates

Subscribe to feed (learn more)

Or get updates by e-mail:

Recent Comments

  • Hi, Yes, I too created a squidoo page - they call it "lens" - there: http://www.squidoo.com/subliminal-subconscious. The site is essentially Web 2.0, wi… Sanjay on Do You Squidoo?
  • Is it not possible that the Nano will not just add but replace a lot of 2 wheelers and even 3 wheelers? Net-net this would be a benefit - pollution, traffic, no… AM on Tata’s Disastrous New Move
  • Great news! Congratulations Sramana I guess you are - the John Galt! But before you run for president's post, I will tell you what to do - Go hijack all… Amit on Election 2008: New Candidate
  • Tom Byers at Stanford's STVP, Andy Hargadon at the UC Davis Center for Entrepreneurship, and Rob Chernow who is Vice-Provost for Entrepreneurship at Rensselaer … Mike Snyder on Professors Of Entrepreneurship?
  • Edward Roberts and Ken Morse at your alma mater!… Shuba on Professors Of Entrepreneurship?
  • Similar to entrepreneurs, entrepreneurship professors don't have a lot of time (at least from my experience). I'll write an e-mail to Maureen anyway and inc… Benedikt on Professors Of Entrepreneurship?