Facebook’s Monetization Strategy (Part 2)

Thursday, July 26, 2007 | 5 comments

Check other articles in the series...

I would, personally, like to see them dominate not only Online Jobs, but also Online Photo Sharing. News Corp recently bought Photobucket as one of MySpace’s Monetization efforts. Photo sharing is one of the top segments and in the US the top 10 photo sharing sites draws around 50 million visitors each month. I have reviewed Flickr, KodakGallery, Shutterfly, and Photobucket, using my Web 3.0 Framework. Shutterfly recently went public, and has been doing well.

Monetization happens primarily through hosting fees and printing / merchandising services. Facebook needs one with a good back-end, including printing / merchandising services. Smugmug could be a good one to acquire.

Similarly, Dating and Matchmaking. If there ever was a killer app for Facebook that is also a large segment, this would be it. I would say, the early-explorers on Facebook arrived in search of love. In the process, the service expanded beyond “love” matches to include “Friend” matches, and it has changed American culture dramatically by making it “cool” to “connect”, “communicate”, “socialize”. Generation Y, I foretell, will be a much more “connected” generation than their isolated, workaholic predecessors, and we have MySpace and Facebook to thank for it.

So tell me, why not a vertical search engine for matchmaking on Facebook that requires a small subscription fee?



This segment is part 2 in a 3 part series
Jump to part: 1, 2, 3

Comments

[…] 1] [Part 2] [Part […]

Facebook’s Monetization Strategy (Part 1) - Sramana Mitra on Strategy Tuesday, July 31, 2007 at 6:02 PM PT

[…] 1] [Part 2] [Part […]

Facebook’s Monetization Strategy (Part 3) - Sramana Mitra on Strategy Tuesday, July 31, 2007 at 6:04 PM PT

[…] 1] [Part 2] [Part […]

Facebook’s Monetization Strategy (Part 3) - Sramana Mitra on Strategy Tuesday, July 31, 2007 at 6:04 PM PT

I’ve been pondering how Facebook/Myspace can monetize better.

I’m not sure how matchmaking for subscription would work. Typically the matchmaking sites give you a profile and charge you to contact someone. It is already free to set up and contact people for free on Facebook.

I don’t understand how they make money with this strategy.

Chris L Tuesday, February 5, 2008 at 1:34 PM PT

Matchmaking is not just setting up profiles. If you look at what eHarmony has done, it has algorithms doing the actual matchmaking. If Facebook puts in such algorithms, they can very well charge users for the service.

Sramana Mitra Tuesday, February 5, 2008 at 3:23 PM PT

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


Free Updates

Subscribe to feed (learn more)

Or get updates by e-mail:

Recent Comments

  • The weirdest of the weird ebay listings.… Ebay on YahooBay, not SkypeBay
  • Sramana, Your blog is fantastic. I spent here about 2 hours tonight, reading and thinking. And I will be back. Thank you.… irina on TeleWebSales: A Methodology Discussion with Anneke Seley (Part 13)
  • Thanks so very much for taking your time to create this very useful and informative site. I have learned a lot from your site. Thanks!!… Hannes on Personal Finance & Web 3.0: Overview
  • That's an insightful and informed presentation of the semantic web from a fresh perspective. You are really approaching this subject from an almost unexplored d… Sayan on Web 3.0 & the Semantic Web
  • Being a small business owner I do not see Obama's policies as all that bad, angel investors or not the saviors of economy. Having a 30 million dollar blog will… stomper on Obama’s Economic Policy
  • Sramana, Bottom line: It's a question of balance. Have you noticed what's happened to the US middle class? The imbalance between the richest 1% and the rest … pk de cville on Obama’s Economic Policy