Eric Benhamou: The Saga Of Palm (Part 4)

Saturday, September 15, 2007 | No comments

Check other articles in the series...

Palm’s product schedule went off-track, as they steered consumers off Palm V, an obviously terrific product, without a compelling new product introduction.

SM: Do you think it created market confusion for customers? EB: Yes. It was a sign that the pace of innovation had slowed down. All of the people we had put in place in senior management slots, and the new folks we had hired leading up to the IPO, were not producing what they were supposed to. They were supposed to inject new innovation, create new markets for Palm to go after. We were particularly focusing on wireless; we knew all along that the handheld PDA was going to be supplanted by a wireless handheld phone of some sort. We were not using the words smartphone yet, but we were thinking about wireless capability and wireless access.

We introduced Palm VII which was the first wireless product. It was not terribly elegant, and it used the paging network so you could not do anything terribly advanced; you could not access the web. You could get email and you could look up things, flight information, weather, and stocks – things like that. It could have been a promising beginning, but because the company had other things to worry about in its main business area, this wireless line was not pursued with the vigor it needed. Towards then end of 2001 in the October / November timeframe, the board came to the conclusion that the management team was not going to be able to turnaround this business in an acceptable timeframe. We decided to make a change.

My colleagues on the board asked me to reengage in the company as interim CEO, which I did. I was uncomfortable doing that because it is never good to go back into a company you have once run. It was a difficult time and we had relatively few options. We did not want to try our chance with a first time CEO. The problems were fundamentally basic operational management problems.

SM: The market in the fall of 2001 was after 9/11; was this also problematic? EB: It affected the consumer side. It put things into perspective. Having a handheld to keep track of appointments and contacts was suddenly not as critical.



This segment is part 4 in a 14 part series
Jump to part: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


Free Updates

Subscribe to feed (learn more)

Or get updates by e-mail:

Recent Comments

  • The weirdest of the weird ebay listings.… Ebay on YahooBay, not SkypeBay
  • Sramana, Your blog is fantastic. I spent here about 2 hours tonight, reading and thinking. And I will be back. Thank you.… irina on TeleWebSales: A Methodology Discussion with Anneke Seley (Part 13)
  • Thanks so very much for taking your time to create this very useful and informative site. I have learned a lot from your site. Thanks!!… Hannes on Personal Finance & Web 3.0: Overview
  • That's an insightful and informed presentation of the semantic web from a fresh perspective. You are really approaching this subject from an almost unexplored d… Sayan on Web 3.0 & the Semantic Web
  • Being a small business owner I do not see Obama's policies as all that bad, angel investors or not the saviors of economy. Having a 30 million dollar blog will… stomper on Obama’s Economic Policy
  • Sramana, Bottom line: It's a question of balance. Have you noticed what's happened to the US middle class? The imbalance between the richest 1% and the rest … pk de cville on Obama’s Economic Policy