Atanu Dey-Vinod Khosla Marshall Plan - Addendum

Saturday, March 3, 2007 | 5 comments

In Atanu Dey’s RISC model, he suggests a move to a micro-city model, as follows:

::

India’s economic growth depends critically on the development of its 700-million strong rural population living in 600,000 villages. The challenge is to manage their transition from a village-centric agricultural-based economy to a city-centric non-agricultural economy urgently.

The total rural population of India can be covered by about 6,000 RISCs each servicing the needs of approximately 100,000 people. By providing a full complement of services, RISC creates a ‘micro-city’ which seeds the formation of a city by drawing to it the population from the surrounding areas. RISC focuses on the development of the rural population, and not on the development of villages which are destined to be extinct anyway.

::

I like the model. My suggestion, however, is to align each of these 6000 RISCs with a major employer, that can employ at least 5,000 people. There is a good trend of manufacturing coming back to India, with car companies, auto parts makers, even semiconductor companies starting to think about setting up factories. The steel sector is booming. Power, Textile, many others are poised for strong growth.

It’s an ideal time, dear Atanu, to set up RISCs in collaboration with large companies.

Comments

[…] Mitra presents a logical, albeit frightening, twist on a solution for India’s struggling rural […]

bcm - the O2 blog » Corporate Cities Monday, March 5, 2007 at 11:29 PM PT

Arguments over economics aside, this scares me - probably because it seems like it could actually happen to a lot of cities, especially new “RISC” cities seeking to establish themselves. Why not? Their older brothers have spent the last 10 - 20 years clamoring for their piece of the outsourcing pie…within a government that is necessarily decentralized.

It could happen - a few years ago, companies like Dell became definitive in cities like Chandigarh - one of the factors that prevented Chandigarh from potentially being rebranded as DellWorld was its size. A micro-city of 100,000 residents can essentially be owned by a corporation…mini-monopolies that can impose their will on cities. Feels dangerous…besides, Orlando sucks.

Sandeep Sood Monday, March 5, 2007 at 11:32 PM PT

Well, Jamshedpur was virtually owned by Tata. It’s a good example of a very successful RISC model.

Sramana Mitra Monday, March 5, 2007 at 11:39 PM PT

Cool…

Thanasios Saturday, June 16, 2007 at 4:58 AM PT

Cool.

Haralambos Wednesday, July 11, 2007 at 12:16 AM PT

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


Free Updates

Subscribe to feed (learn more)

Or get updates by e-mail:

Recent Comments

  • Sorry if I gave an impression of being anti-corporate (I work in one too!). But you missed the point. Companies sustain through focus on finding ways to improve… Amit on Obama and Outsourcing
  • good perspective... from my experience I would say its partly true and not true.. 1. Frugality: must.. critical for first 30 months, i believe.. 2. Big compan… Nandan on The Path to Entrepreneurship
  • What is free trade for? Is it for Corporations to keep bettering their QoQ or YoY profits on the same ruthless business-model (lacking innovation)? And what do … Amit on Obama and Outsourcing
  • I see outsourcing as an opportunity than a threat and the whole world is a global village recent comment by Obama in tax incentive cut for US companies if they … santhosh on Obama and Outsourcing
  • Very interesting views from people from all walks of American life.As a non-american,I find it very engaging that common people in America are so involved and a… manjeet on Obama and Outsourcing
  • Hi Sramana, Thanks for writing about us. I would like to add a few points about how we are different from the legacy players. 1) Ease of use: Zero install… DD Ganguly on Deal Radar 2008: Dimdim