Is Google Monetizing YouTube?

Thursday, June 14, 2007 | 5 comments

Now that it has been a few months since Google bought YouTube, we can look at how it is benefiting from it. Comscore data for March 2007 seems promising. YouTube’s popularity has made Google the most frequented site for streaming videos. Out of 57.4 million unique visitors who played video clips on Google, almost 53.5 million came through YouTube. Google thus enjoys 16.7% market share of online videos compared to Yahoo!, the nearest rival commanding only 6.2% of the market. The study went on to establish that 30% of US surfers prefer YouTube for streaming videos.

Google has already started making efforts to monetize YouTube. First step in this direction is to retain successful content producers, so YouTube has quality content. In January 2007, Google made an announcement to reward producers who share completely original videos. Taking this a step ahead, YouTube in May 2007 invited its popular providers to become partners. YouTube also organizes international meetings called “As One” of its most recognized contributors. These are welcome moves but require careful policy making so providers benefit financially too, not just by lip service.

Google is also paying attention to copyright issues to avoid getting entangled in Viacom like suits. Some companies like Universal Music Group after filing suits against YouTube took a u-turn on realizing its popularity. They signed agreements with YouTube to promote their videos. Not all companies however, want to do so.

YouTube’s existing system of filtering violent, pornographic, defaming and other inappropriate content is obviously not enough. To strengthen their stance on copyrights, Eric Schmidt, Google’s CEO, on April 16, 2007 announced introduction of Claim Your Content, a content filtering system to help identify and eliminate copyrighted material. As of May 2007, this service is in testing phase.

Google has some other innovative ideas too. It plans to offer Click-to-Play online video ads based on AdWords. Promoting this is the introduction of Google AD Creation Marketplace, a forum where advertisers can meet professional video ad makers. Google can earn more revenue if it allows advertisers to interact with YouTube content providers. This will be a win-win situation for advertisers and service providers, since advertisers will get cost-effective product placement, while producers will get a platform to showcase their skills. I like this effort a lot.

A March 2007 statement by Eric Schmidt warning investors against expecting too much from YouTube in the near future, sums up Google’s situation. Ultimately, success of its YouTube acquisition will depend on the way Google irons out copyright issues, promotes video ads, and entices advertisers. None of this is happening at a large scale yet.

Comments

Can you explain to me why your headline on Seeking Alpha says “How Google is monetizing Youtube” yet your article above says “Is Google monetizing Youtube?”

There is a HUGE difference between those 2 headlones. Google is not making dollar 1 with youtube outside of some crappy adsense ads that no onle looks at or clicks on.

The reason I ask is because I am sick and tired of watching “journalists” have complete Google blindness. Google does a lot of great things, yes, but please call a spade a spade.

To say that Google is monetizing Youtube and then explain that they have lots of traffic and are doing their best to avoid ANOTHER lawssuit is a total disconnect.

No one has the guts to say that Google hasn’t dont squat with youtube from a $$ standpoint. Not to mention that all of their most watched videos are either in japanese or look like porn. Take a look for yourself.

I’d love to see someone write an objective article about Google…just once!

youtubemakesnomoney Friday, June 15, 2007 at 9:03 AM PT

Well, Seeking Alpha’s editors are always dicking around with my headlines. I agree with you, their headline makes no sense, because the article IS about YouTube not yet making money.

And if you read my prior articles about Google, you will see, I am a strong critic of the company.

Sramana Mitra Friday, June 15, 2007 at 11:18 AM PT

Hi Sramana, This is a good article… there is a flurry of video platforms out now, and all the top production houses have their own video platoforms.. today an average consumer is watching TV and also downloading videos on their computer while seeing youtube videos on their phones… they hop platforms almost every minutes.. these companies make their money in advertising and unless measurement is in place, not a single penny is going to move which is going make monetizing youtube really hard.

Check out the real metrics platform my divinity Metrics, they provide rich analytics and demographics on several platforms including Youtube and I think their service is really valuable and is the first step towards monetizing any online video content.

Cheers

Drew Thursday, July 19, 2007 at 6:41 PM PT

[…] $1.65 billion acquisition of then newly launched YouTube by Google in October 2006 highlights the market’s bullishness about the potential of Online Video. […]

Online Video Beneficiaries: Cisco - Sramana Mitra on Strategy Thursday, September 6, 2007 at 7:28 AM PT

[…] monetization strategies of YouTube continued for the quarter with the launch of AdSense for videos. In-video ads can now run on sites […]

Google Strong, But Microsoft Pays Attention to Verticals - Sramana Mitra on Strategy Friday, April 18, 2008 at 3:37 PM PT

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


Free Updates

Subscribe to feed (learn more)

Or get updates by e-mail:

Recent Comments

  • Thanks so very much for taking your time to create this very useful and informative site. I have learned a lot from your site. Thanks!!… Hannes on Personal Finance & Web 3.0: Overview
  • That's an insightful and informed presentation of the semantic web from a fresh perspective. You are really approaching this subject from an almost unexplored d… Sayan on Web 3.0 & the Semantic Web
  • Being a small business owner I do not see Obama's policies as all that bad, angel investors or not the saviors of economy. Having a 30 million dollar blog will… stomper on Obama’s Economic Policy
  • Sramana, Bottom line: It's a question of balance. Have you noticed what's happened to the US middle class? The imbalance between the richest 1% and the rest … pk de cville on Obama’s Economic Policy
  • Sorry if I gave an impression of being anti-corporate (I work in one too!). But you missed the point. Companies sustain through focus on finding ways to improve… Amit on Obama and Outsourcing
  • good perspective... from my experience I would say its partly true and not true.. 1. Frugality: must.. critical for first 30 months, i believe.. 2. Big compan… Nandan on The Path to Entrepreneurship