“Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new.” — Albert Einstein

Apple’s Dramatic Risks and Ambitions

Thursday, April 24, 2008 Related Content Share/Send | 6 comments

News from Apple is often big news. Apple released its second quarter results yesterday. Revenue was $7.51 billion, down 22% q-o-q and up 42% y-o-y driven by strong demand for Macs and the ever-popular iPhone. Net income was $1.05 billion, or $1.16 per diluted share, up 36% y-o-y. International sales, which were 44% of the revenue, grew 47% and US sales grew 40%.

Apple sold 2.29 million Macs with a growth of 51% y-o-y that is about 3.5 times the overall PC market rate of growth. Macs accounted for 59% of the revenue in the quarter, up from 47% last quarter. Our household now boasts a beautiful, large-screen iMac on which we’re playing with photos and music to create iMovie clips of our travels, horse, and such. We still have 2 Vista laptops, a source of continuous annoyance. Those two are probably on their way out.

With revenue mix shifting towards the Macs, music products and services accounted for 36% of revenue in the quarter, down from 50% last quarter. Sales of iPods at 10.6 million seem to have saturated with a growth of just 1%. A price reduction helped improve the sales of Shuffle. The iPod Touch which is an iPhone without the mobile capabilities helped in the 8% y-o-y iPod revenue growth.

Now to what everyone wants to know about – iPhone sales. Apple sold 1.7 million iPhones in the quarter taking the total to 5.7 million since the launch. In fact, there was shortage of iPhones towards the end of the quarter as demand far exceeded expectations. When AT&T reported net adds of just 1.3 million, there were concerns about iPhone sales crossing the 1 million mark. However, unlocked iPhone sales seem to have bridged the gap and Apple seems confident of meeting the 10 million target for this year.

The iPhone 2.0 software, which is expected to launch in June, would help in its goal. People buying iPhones in the interim will be provided a free upgrade. Therefore, revenue recognition of iPhone sales will be delayed till iPhone 2.0 software is delivered. Total revenue from sales of iPhone, iPhone accessories, and payments from carriers was $378 million. Total deferred revenue from iPhone and Apple TV was $1.93 billion, compared to $1.44 billion in the previous quarter.

Apple launched the iPhone in Austria and Ireland during the quarter but things are not so rosy in Europe. O2, the UK carrier, recently cut the iPhone price from £269 to £169 and T-Mobile had earlier in the month cut the price from €399 (£319) to €99. There are reports of Apple pushing for price cuts in France with the carrier Orange to increase sales. Apple will probably change its distribution model of exclusive carriers outside the US.

Starting with just 4% market share when it was launched last year, Apple has now 9% of the smartphone market share against RIM’s 42% according to ChangeWave Research. And with the iPhone being made compatible for use in the enterprise, it would be interesting to watch its race with RIMM. For the moment, most of Apple’s market share wins are coming at the expense of Palm’s Treo and Motorola’s RAZR, another product that we have two of in our house. Those two, in due course, are also moving on to the iPhone.

For the third quarter, Apple is targeting revenue of around $7.2 billion, or 33% y-o-y growth over the prior June quarter. EPS is expected to be about $1.00.

Meanwhile reports of Apple’s $278 million acquisition of microprocessor design company PA Semi has overshadowed its earnings reports. PA Semi is known for its design of low-power chips. This acquisition has thrown cold water over Intel’s hopes of securing a design win for Atom, its latest low-power lineup and will cause a shift in the iPhone component ecosystem. But more than that Apple has taken on a significant risk by vertically integrating into semiconductors with the hope that they can achieve differentiation in their core electronics, not only in design, OS and applications. If Apple’s move succeeds, then we’re going back to a vertically integrated computer industry, which is where it all started. The interim Wintel model will come to be looked upon as the detour. We can always trust Steve Jobs to create drama. We can always trust Steve Jobs to be ambitious.

Apple’s stock is trading around $162 with a market cap of around $143 billion. After dropping to nearly $120, it has started picking up in March since its enterprise announcement. And this morning, the upward climb looks resolute.

Chart for Apple Inc. (AAPL)

Comments

I like your idea of vertical integration. Like I have mentioned in my blog-post on this topic, Apple needs to make sure it is differentiated and wards off imitators who are perenially playing catch-up. Integration helps in efficient power, performance, application and service optimization. I think that is the key to its future success, the key to maintaining the Apple niche and brand value.

Vijay

Vijay Nagarajan Thursday, April 24, 2008 at 12:38 PM PT

[…] Read the rest of the original post » Add Comment Be the first to comment on this story and earn 2 points. […]

Apple - TradeRadarOperator - SocialPicks Thursday, April 24, 2008 at 1:31 PM PT

[…] it would be interesting to watch its race with RIMM. For the moment, most of Apple…   Read the rest of the original post » Add Comment Be the first to comment on this story and earn 2 points. […]

Apple's Dramatic Risks and Ambitions - Sramana Mitra - SocialPicks Thursday, April 24, 2008 at 1:38 PM PT

Vijay, This only works if Apple can achieve some sort of a technical breakthrough with low-power design, which isn’t a given. But this is certainly worth a try. Sramana

Sramana Mitra Thursday, April 24, 2008 at 2:41 PM PT

I am curious about why Apple should pursue this vertical integration ? Nokia took the opposite path by moving to a chipset strategy.Where is it said that this acquisition is for their iPod / iPhone ? Could it not be for Mac’s , or an impending UMPC ?

Cathy Anthoine Thursday, April 24, 2008 at 5:07 PM PT

Cathy, Please read the Forbes column from this morning. That will answer your question, I think.

Sramana Mitra Friday, April 25, 2008 at 9:01 AM PT

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


Free Updates

Subscribe to feed (learn more)

Or get updates by e-mail:

Recent Comments

  • Is there a chance you could post a pic or 2 or maybe some flickr link etc for us to see what the final creation looked like? … Arpan on Vision India 2020: Urja
  • Sramana, This piece & Gautam Godhwani's work towards the India Community Center (part of your Interview Series) got me wondering. Is ther… Srinagesh Eranki on Vision India 2020: Urja
  • Sramana, We thank God, as He has a greater purpose for you which we see here ... in bringing consciousness to a wider world! http://en.wikipe… KP on Narayan Murthy's Speech at NYU (Part 6)
  • Hi Sramana, Great! I am glad to see that you are taking this on as a serious key column discussion. Lets start with my key inspirer and best … KP on Forbes Column: Hydro-Alchemy
  • Sramana, Wow! just today my wife and I went out to get a gift for a Japanese customer. Went to our favorite Kashmiri handicrafts store here in Bangalore - fe… K. Srikrishna on Vision India 2020: Urja
  • This seems like one of the biggest developments in making desal affordable, and this article is the first I've heard of the company. Is there a reason it isn… Jason Kaminsky on Forbes Column: Hydro-Alchemy

From Related Sites

Close
E-mail It