Infineon: The Qimonda Challenge

Thursday, June 19, 2008 | 2 comments

Check other articles in the series...

By Vijay Nagarajan, Guest Author

In the last part of this series, we looked at Infineon’s recent financials and pointed out that Qimonda is a key reason why the company is struggling to create more shareholders’ value. Let us now take a deeper look into Qimonda’s challenges and Infineon’s strategic initiatives to address the situation.

The picture below, taken from Infineon’s fiscal 2007 annual report, illustrates the root cause of Qimonda’s misery.

DRAM_prices

The DRAM prices dropped a whopping 29% in fiscal 2007 led by seasonal demand weakness, inventory build-up prior to the Windows Vista launch and capacity conversion from NAND to DRAM by the competition. The 44% increase in shipments and the continuing market diversification strategy were not enough to stave off these challenges leading to a net sales decrease of 207 million Euros in 2007.

Despite these issues, the DRAM business requires Qimonda to invest heavily in its research and manufacturing capabilities. In 2007, Qimonda announced plans to build new manufacturing facilities in Singapore and Malaysia. It also announced an agreement with SanDisk to jointly develop and manufacture Multi-chip Packages. Additionally, the company hopes to leverage its product and market diversification strategy to increase DRAM average selling prices (ASPs), profitability and return on capital.

Last week, Qimonda and Elpida, both top-5 DRAM suppliers, signed final contracts for a strategic technology partnership on joint development of DRAMs. Primarily a move to gain scale, this agreement encompasses a broad cross licensing of Intellectual Property that gives both companies higher design freedom while aligning their development interests. Elpida’s CEO is also quoted as saying that he was open to a share swap with Infineon.

Infineon wants to get out of the memory business. It announced recently that it wants to reduce its current 78% stake in Qimonda to below 50% by the 2009 Annual General Meeting. While not many will pay cash for this stake, share swaps with companies like Elpida may help constrict the supply and stem the free-fall in DRAM prices. With private equity unlikely to pick up Qimonda due to its unattractive cash flow, such share swaps may be the unfortunate reality that Infineon has to face today.

In summary, Infineon is unlikely to relieve itself of the memory business overnight. The huge write-off in the last quarter demonstrates that the company has realized this hard fact. It will have to swallow more losses despite its valuable R&D and manufacturing capabilities. From a valuation perspective, Qimonda will continue to have a considerable negative impact on Infineon’s share price.

This segment is part 9 in a 15 part series
Jump to part: Infineon, Infineon, Nokia Aligns with ST, Motorola with Infineon, The Infineon Alliance, Infineon, QCOM, NOK, Infineon, Company Overview, Financials, The Qimonda Challenge, Industrial and Automotive business, Wireline Communications Business, Wireless Business, Future and Strategy, Valuation,

Comments

[…] in detail the various businesses of Infineon and also peeked into its strategy. We noted that Qimonda was the cause of most of its miseries. We also suggested acquisition and growth possibilities for […]

Infineon: Valuation - Sramana Mitra on Strategy Sunday, July 27, 2008 at 7:41 AM PT

The DRAM price fall is only one of Qimonda’s troubles. Additional troubles are Qimonda has been slower than competitors by about 9 months to migrate to smaller geometries, the use of trench capacitors which is more expensive to manufacture and hitting the scalability wall, the high cost of German labor, complete failure of its NAND flash division, and its repeated failures in joint ventures and production outsourcing. Qimonda should be carved up and the pieces sold to other companies.

J Boone Sunday, August 10, 2008 at 1:47 PM PT

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


Free Updates

Subscribe to feed (learn more)

Or get updates by e-mail:

Recent Comments

  • Being a small business owner I do not see Obama's policies as all that bad, angel investors or not the saviors of economy. Having a 30 million dollar blog will… stomper on Obama’s Economic Policy
  • Sramana, Bottom line: It's a question of balance. Have you noticed what's happened to the US middle class? The imbalance between the richest 1% and the rest … pk de cville on Obama’s Economic Policy
  • Sorry if I gave an impression of being anti-corporate (I work in one too!). But you missed the point. Companies sustain through focus on finding ways to improve… Amit on Obama and Outsourcing
  • good perspective... from my experience I would say its partly true and not true.. 1. Frugality: must.. critical for first 30 months, i believe.. 2. Big compan… Nandan on The Path to Entrepreneurship
  • What is free trade for? Is it for Corporations to keep bettering their QoQ or YoY profits on the same ruthless business-model (lacking innovation)? And what do … Amit on Obama and Outsourcing
  • I see outsourcing as an opportunity than a threat and the whole world is a global village recent comment by Obama in tax incentive cut for US companies if they … santhosh on Obama and Outsourcing